A Florida bill that would have required drivers who refuse to submit to breathalyzers to immediately install ignition interlock devices has died in the House committee.
Broward defense lawyers had been greatly concerned that the proposed Florida DUI law would run afoul of 4th Amendment Due process rights.
HB 39 and its companion bill, SB 260, would have required any driver arrested for DUI who refuses to submit to a lawful breath test to automatically be required to install an ignition interlock device on their vehicle. This would be done at the driver’s own expense – which can cost anywhere from $670 to $1,610 The first refusal would result in a one-year license suspension and subsequent incidents of refusal would result in an 18 month license suspension. The DMV would require such placement before issuing a permanent or restricted driver’s license related to such refusal.
For those who may be unfamiliar, ignition interlock devices are small, electronic devices (about the size of a cell phone) wired to a vehicle’s ignition that require the driver to provide a breath sample negative for alcohol before the car will start. Drivers may also be periodically required to provide a breath sample to ensure they aren’t drinking while driving.
The reason this particular bill rankled Broward defense lawyers is because it appeared to impose a penalty right after arrest – not as a punishment following conviction. People arrested are innocent until proven guilty. This is a fundamental foundation of our criminal justice framework. To impose a penalty on someone incidental to arrest, when they are still presumed innocent, is a violation of due process. Continue reading